Derivation of Group Delay as Modulation Delay Next  |  Prev  |  Up  |  Top  |  Index  |  JOS Index  |  JOS Pubs  |  JOS Home  |  Search

Derivation of Group Delay as Modulation Delay

Suppose we write a narrowband signal centered at frequency $ \omega_c$ as

$\displaystyle x(n) = a_m(n) e^{j\omega_c n} \protect$ (8.5)

where $ \omega_c$ is defined as the carrier frequency (in radians per sample), and $ a_m(n)$ is some narrowband amplitude modulation signal. The modulation $ a_m$ can be complex-valued to represent either phase or amplitude modulation or both. By ``narrowband,'' we mean that the spectrum of $ a_m$ is concentrated near dc, i.e.,

$\displaystyle a_m(n)
= \frac{1}{2\pi} \int_{-\pi}^{\pi} A_m(\omega)e^{j\omega ...
...ox \frac{1}{2\pi} \int_{-\epsilon}^{\epsilon} A_m(\omega)e^{j\omega n} d\omega

for some $ \left\vert\epsilon\right\vert\ll\pi$. The modulation bandwidth is thus bounded by $ 2\epsilon\ll\pi$.

Using the above frequency-domain expansion of $ a_m(n)$, $ x(n)$ can be written as

$\displaystyle x(n) = \left[\frac{1}{2\pi} \int_{-\epsilon}^{\epsilon} A_m(\omega)e^{j\omega n} d\omega\right] e^{j\omega_c n},

which we may view as a scaled superposition of sinusoidal components of the form

$\displaystyle x_\omega(n) \isdef A_m(\omega)e^{j\omega n} e^{j\omega_c n}
= A_m(\omega)e^{j(\omega+\omega_c) n}

with $ \omega$ near 0. Let us now pass the frequency component $ x_\omega(n)$ through an LTI filter $ H(z)$ having frequency response

$\displaystyle H(e^{j\omega}) = G(\omega) e^{j\Theta(\omega)}

to get

$\displaystyle y_\omega(n) = \left[G(\omega_c+\omega)A_m(\omega)\right] e^{j[(\omega_c +\omega) n + \Theta(\omega_c+\omega)]}. \protect$ (8.6)

Assuming the phase response $ \Theta(\omega)$ is approximately linear over the narrow frequency interval $ \omega\in[\omega_c-\epsilon,\omega_c+\epsilon]$, we can write

$\displaystyle \Theta(\omega_c+\omega)\approx \Theta(\omega_c) + \Theta^\prime(\omega_c)\omega
\isdef \Theta(\omega_c) - D(\omega_c)\omega

where $ D(\omega_c)$ is the filter group delay at $ \omega_c$. Making this substitution in Eq. (7.6) gives

&=& \left[G(\omega_c+\omega)A_m(\omega)\right]
e^{j\omega[n-D(\omega_c)]} e^{j\omega_c[n-P(\omega_c)]},

where we also used the definition of phase delay, $ P(\omega_c) =
-\Theta(\omega_c)/\omega_c$, in the last step. Integrating over $ \omega$ to recombine the sinusoidal components (i.e., using a Fourier superposition integral for $ y$) gives

y(n) &=& \frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{\omega} y_\omega(n) d\omega \\
&=& a^f[n-D(\omega_c)] \cdot e^{j\omega_c[n-P(\omega_c)]}

where $ a^f(n)$ denotes a zero-phase filtering of the amplitude envelope $ a(n)$ by $ G(\omega+\omega_c)$. We see that the amplitude modulation is delayed by $ D(\omega_c)$ while the carrier wave is delayed by $ P(\omega_c)$.

We have shown that, for narrowband signals expressed as in Eq. (7.5) as a modulation envelope times a sinusoidal carrier, the carrier wave is delayed by the filter phase delay, while the modulation is delayed by the filter group delay, provided that the filter phase response is approximately linear over the narrowband frequency interval.

Next  |  Prev  |  Up  |  Top  |  Index  |  JOS Index  |  JOS Pubs  |  JOS Home  |  Search

[How to cite this work] [Order a printed hardcopy]

``Introduction to Digital Filters with Audio Applications'', by Julius O. Smith III, (August 2006 Edition).
Copyright © 2007-02-02 by Julius O. Smith III
Center for Computer Research in Music and Acoustics (CCRMA),   Stanford University
CCRMA  [Automatic-links disclaimer]